It has been a quiet week, but the three items below each tell an important story.
Local Government
Tisk, tisk! This article seems to be
suggesting there has been a furtive development of shared services between the
two councils. If true, and not just a bending of the truth by upset employees,
you have to conclude that there is a lack of skills in collaborative working
within the organisations. In the SSA Highway Code we recommend that the leaders
of the organisation: Announces that they are running out of money and one of
the solutions could be collaborative working with a partnering organisation.
That gives the freedom to explore shared services openly…
Islington and Camden council chiefs accused of cover-up over plans to merge legal departments
Leaked documents reveal Islington Council is considering merging with
other boroughs in a radical shake-up of how public services are delivered. Read
more >>>
Does anyone want to challenge this
headline? I thought places like Kent and the East Midlands had already done
this…however, it still seems strange that in 2014 local authorities are not
connected up to enhance their collaborative working…
London unites local authorities on Public Services Network
London is the first region to connect all of its local authorities to
the Public Services Network (PSN) through the London Public Services Network
(LondonPSN). Read
more >>>
This is a bit of a non-story, as Worcester have not been
asked by Malvern and Wychavon if they want to have a ménage a trois leadership.
However it still illustrates the un-popularity of shared council CEOs.
The potential number could be about 170, however there are less than 30…
We won't be sharing a boss with Malvern and Wychavon, says Worcester City Council's leadership
The leader of Worcester City Council has ruled out sharing a chief
executive with Malvern and Wychavon - saying he does not want to get involved
in the surprise talks. Read
more >>>
Receive this Shared Service News Summary into your inbox every week. Just register on our website.